On The Ultimatum Isn't Testing Love. It's Testing Nervous Systems.
Photo from IMDB page for The Ultimatum
Netflix's The Ultimatum: Marry or Move On just dropped its fourth season, and the premise remains the same. If you aren’t familiar with this franchise, lets break it down.
One partner gives the other an ultimatum: get engaged or split up. Both then join a trial marriage with a stranger for three weeks, switch back to a final trial marriage with their original partner, and land on Ultimatum Day, where they decide if they're staying together or going their separate ways. Naturally drama ensues with the hope the audience is captivated.
A Relationship Test That's Really a Stress Test
As a couples therapist practicing PACT (the Psychobiological Approach to Couple Therapy), I've been watching this show and noticing that what gets sold as a "relationship test" is really a stress test. Here's the distinction that matters.
PACT is built on the idea that couples aren't just two personalities navigating logistics, they're two nervous systems trying to find each other, what we call co-regulation. When we feel safe with a partner, we can access what PACT calls our "ambassador" self, curious, flexible, able to repair after a rupture. When we feel threatened, we drop into survival strategies instead, fight, flight, freeze, or fawn, and none of those are known for producing our best relational decisions.
Why The Ultimatum Is More of a Stress Test Than a Relationship Test
The Format Removes the Things That Help Couples Feel Safe
Now look at what The Ultimatum actually does. It strips people of every environment that makes them feel safe.
No shared history with this new "spouse." No established routines, no repair rituals, no inside jokes or pre-established levity, no physical familiarity.
Then the show adds a countdown clock, cameras, and the explicit threat of losing the person they came in with.
That's not a neutral space to explore compatibility. That's a controlled threat experiment, and ethics tend to leave the room when “good” television is on the line.
Relationship Anxiety Can Look Like Clarity When the Nervous System Is Under Threat
What we watch as viewers is people navigating uncertainty with someone they've known for eight days, while their long-term partner does the same thing with someone else. The show frames the return to your original partner as the moment clarity arrives. I don't see it that way. I see a nervous system responding to the threat of losing security, and that response getting mistaken for insight.
Why Relationship Repair Matters—and What The Ultimatum Leaves Out
The Format Creates Rupture Without Making Room for Repair
Ultimatum Day happens right after six weeks of what I can only assume would be destabilizing and dysregulating, where the format fails to create space for sincere and genuine repair.
Some couples find their own way to it, but what we see on screen is a rupture, a fight, a hookup, a confession, and then a hard cut to the next dramatic beat. Watching it, I noticed my own anxiety build scene to scene, waiting for some kind of repair that never showed up, just building tension.
In PACT terms, repair capacity is one of the strongest predictors of relationship health. This format has none of it built in.
What plays as growth is often just adrenaline that hasn't worn off yet.
The Emotions Are Real, Even When the Environment Is Manufactured
None of this means the emotions on the show aren't real. They are, and that's the problem.
Real fear. Real jealousy. Real attachment panic.
They’re produced by a setting built to generate exactly that, then read as signal about who someone should marry instead of what it actually is: a pot the show set simmering on purpose.
The drama isn't a side effect of the format. It's the product.
When the Stakes Turn Physical
Which is where this stops being just a critique of TV.
This season, multiple allegations of physical violence surfaced at the reunion. Ashley alleged that Killian threw and broke her phone, that she hid in a closet and called her parents for help, and that he put his hands on her. The allegations weren’t limited to the reunion: Blake was arrested in October 2025 following an alleged assault involving Hayley.
And this isn’t the first time the franchise has put physical violence between partners on screen. In Season 2, viewers watched Lisa strike Brian during an argument—an incident Lisa later publicly acknowledged and apologized for. And on The Ultimatum: Queer Love Season 1, Mildred was arrested for throwing furniture at Tiff during a fight at their home, including a pet gate and a photo frame that shattered. Tiff said she felt unsafe with Mildred at the reunion and walked off stage in tears. They were still brought back to face each other on camera, with no safeguards in place.
What troubles me isn’t only that these moments happened. It’s how the franchise handles them. Violence between partners is presented alongside the fights, betrayals, hookups, and reconciliations that make up the show's ordinary relationship drama, without the kind of clear distinction or intervention the subject demands.
Not naming that distinction does more than skip an uncomfortable moment. It risks normalizing the pattern.
That’s not just unethical TV. That’s not drama. That’s negligent, and it has a profound and harmful ripple effect.
If This Feels Familiar
Relationship conflict and intimate partner violence are not the same thing. If you’re experiencing physical violence, threats, coercion, intimidation, or other forms of abuse in a relationship, couples therapy may not be an appropriate or safe place to start.
Peace Over Violence offers support, information, and resources for survivors of sexual and domestic violence in Los Angeles and beyond.
The Ethical Responsibility of Reality Dating Shows
That's the part that should trouble anyone watching through a clinical lens, not just a PACT one.
A format built to manufacture panic on camera is already on shaky ethical ground. Doing that to people with a documented history of violence, filming the fallout, then sitting them across from each other again with no real intervention, is more than that.
It teaches an audience of millions that rupture, danger, and reunion can be what commitment looks like.
If you're going to platform real couples' worst moments for entertainment, the baseline obligation is not putting people in danger to get there.
This franchise hasn't consistently met that bar.
What Actually Makes a Relationship Feel Safe?
A relationship doesn’t become secure because it survives the biggest possible test. Safety is built in much smaller, less cinematic moments: knowing your partner has your back, being able to predict how they’ll respond when things get hard, repairing after you hurt each other, and protecting the relationship rather than threatening it when you’re scared.
In PACT, we talk about secure functioning: the ways partners create a relationship that feels safe, mutual, collaborative, and fair. That doesn’t mean never fighting or never getting activated. It means building a relationship where both people can trust that conflict won’t put the relationship—or either person’s wellbeing—at risk.
If you’re wondering what that can actually look like in your own relationship, we put together nine secure-functioning tips for couples, including ways to create more safety, repair, and connection with each other.
And if you and your partner keep getting caught in the same cycles even when you’re both trying to do something different, couples therapy at Kindman & Co. can help you understand what’s happening underneath those patterns and practice new ways of finding each other when things get hard.
Featured therapist author:
Elizabeth Taylor is a queer, neurodivergent Associate Marriage and Family Therapist #132575 who brings a deep understanding of trauma and the many ways it can shape our bodies, relationships, and sense of self. She is committed to creating therapeutic spaces that feel safe, inclusive, and grounded in genuine care. Her goal is to offer a place where healing can unfold through connection, community, and the steady presence of someone who truly sees you. Elizabeth is especially passionate about working with queer and LGBTQIA+ clients and neurodivergent communities. Much of her work centers on exploring identity, desires, relationships, and the impact of the systems we move through. She supports clients in questioning limiting narratives, reclaiming their autonomy, and rediscovering the parts of themselves that have always deserved gentleness.
Her approach balances depth with playfulness, honoring the heaviness that can come with healing while still making room for joy, silliness, and moments of ease. Outside of therapy, Elizabeth is a sister, daughter, friend, devoted cat parent, and lifelong deep thinker. She enjoys discovering new corners of the city, spending time in parks, mermaiding, hiking, snowboarding, crafting, and getting a little too invested in board games. Her life and work are guided by a strong commitment to justice, equity, and community connection.
GET HELP NOW
If you are interested in therapy with Kindman & Co. and would like to learn more about the services we have to help you, follow these quick & easy steps:
Schedule a free 20-minute phone consultation with our Care Coordinator.
Get matched with the therapist who’s right for you.
Start feeling more supported and fulfilled in your life!
THERAPY AT KINDMAN & CO.
We are here for your diverse L.A. counseling needs. Our team of therapists provides lgbtqia+ affirmative therapy, grief & loss counseling, group therapy, and more. We have specialists in trauma, women's issues, depression & anxiety, substance use, mindfulness & embodiment, and support for creatives. For therapists and practice owners, we also provide consultation and supervision services! We look forward to welcoming you for therapy in Highland Park and online.
